← TLÁLOC AgrofintechTECHNOLOGY + METHODOLOGY

From data to a
verifiable assessment.

Specialized models and agents connect territorial observations, agroclimatic context and production records. Each study is built around a property, a growing season and a question.

Conceptual scene of sugarcane plots and water resources
OBSERVE THE LAND. UNDERSTAND ITS RELATIONSHIPS.

Evidence retains
its identity.

A measurement, a report and a simulation answer different questions. Their provenance and scope accompany the analysis.

01 / OBSERVATIONS

What is recorded.

Images, stations, measurements and records with dates and locations. We review coverage, resolution and observation conditions.

02 / PRODUCTION RECORDS

What the operation contributes.

Available crop, management, cost, harvest and sales information. We document its origin and the checks performed.

03 / BIOPHYSICAL MODELS

What is explored.

Production scenarios under specific climate, soil, water and management conditions. Results are cross-checked against local references when available.

04 / FINANCIAL CONTEXT

What the decision requires.

We relate production scenarios to documented prices, costs and cash-flow timing. Financial analysis requires operational records.

HISTORY AND CHANGE

Understand the past.
Explore scenarios.

Agroclimatic and territorial history makes it possible to observe changes and put the growing season in context. The available period depends on the sources and observation quality.

Reconstructing land use does not mean knowing every management practice. Estimated yield is distinguished from a measured harvest and presented with its assumptions.

To study financing or insurance, we seek to connect the plot, growing season, management and actual outcomes. That relationship helps assess the usefulness of the models.

A chain
of evidence.

We organize information to facilitate review, version control and comparisons across periods.

  1. 01

    Identify

    The plot, growing season, purpose and conditions for using the information.

  2. 02

    Connect

    Sources, dates, geometry and references used in each study.

  3. 03

    Document

    The approach, version, assumptions and scope of conclusions.

  4. 04

    Cross-check

    Field observations and available outcomes to review performance and limitations.

  5. 05

    Deliver

    A reviewable dossier and a monitoring plan agreed with the institution.

Each project's capabilities, sources and evaluation criteria are agreed before work begins. Technology supports the institution's professional judgment.

THE NEXT STEP

Let's understand your challenge.
Let's define the first step.

Let's start with an exploratory conversation about your assessment or monitoring process. We can identify a specific need and agree what evidence would help you address it.

Schedule a conversation rafael.velasco@tlaloc.tech
FOR OUR FIRST CONVERSATION
  1. Your institution and the process you want to improve
  2. Where time, cost or uncertainty are concentrated
  3. What outcome would be useful for your team

A concrete starting point.
A tailored proposal.